Originally Posted by
waterboy
You are speaking in hyperbole, right?
"I truly think that our management team would rather see the company burn down than to ever allow scope on property
A company that is paying almost a 2% dividend, and has made over $800M per year over that last 2 years, and boasts about industry leading profit margins of over 20%, would rather burn this place down?
Its that attitude that has kept Alaska Management succesful in keeping scope out of all previous CBAs.
Yes, I am speaking in hyperbole. My point was moreso that I believe management is willing to accept lower operational performance and a potentially permanently damaged relationship with its pilot group in order to keep scope off property, amongst other things.