Originally Posted by
BlueJetDork
Stop being such a drama queer.
Of course Mint has been a success. United did the same thing.
It was Marty's baby at UAL. We are copying a branded product within a brand. UAL had PS and we have Mint.
However the success is limited to certain markets and we are running out of new markets and the markets that we will enter into in the near future we have been told to not expect the same Mint Effect on revenue.
After these markets then what? The Mint bubble has almost run it course (running out of steam) and Wall St has taken note and our stock is floundering.
What is the plan with our high margins low cost structure that was supposed to be a disrupter in the industry.
One poster said to over fly our own routes with more frequency. AKA, kill our our RASM?
We are floundering (original point) but hey we have high margins bought to Wall St via very low costs.
Lets throw a party for ourselves.
Man I took a week off.
Again as I said this was all expected.
I don’t know how you use limited markets which they said it was built for against them.
As for the drama queer.....how about you grow up Burt.