Thread: 18-04v new*
View Single Post
Old 12-20-2017 | 09:00 PM
  #102  
Probe
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
Really? With what new hires are we staffing that expansion? Our contract work rules haven’t changed in five years, the pilot productivity hasn’t gone up a bit, so whose staffing all this expansion?



If they want to build 20 hour three days instead of 20 hour four days I’m all for it. I’d gladly do 2 min turn layovers and have several more days off a month while being more productive. However the company writes the schedule and there is nothing in the contract preventing this. Meanwhile since 2013 when the 3.5:1 went into effect there has NEVER been a month in which productivity per day for 320/737 crews has even come close to 6 hours per day, let alone the 7-8 that would be needed to make us competitive to the likes of SWA. Until they start upping our productivity mgmts is just making noise. With a productivity average of 5.3 hours a day, any narrowbody staffing problem is self inflicted.
Couldn't agree more. It took over 10 years to get a decent trip rig back. The only thing that will force the company to do better, is an even better trip rig. 3:1 anyone? Bueller?

It would be my number 1 contract "wish". It benefits everyone, including the company, and our investors. It forces UAL to use assets, including us, more efficiently. That is the best way to compete with Delta and ULC carriers.
Reply