Originally Posted by
FlyGuy2002
I love it!! PBS costs jobs and one class away from being furloughed , meaning you want more jobs and more folks behind you in case the furlough comes down, then the very next sentence you talk about union brothers and sisters... you're as loyal as Judas
He’s trying to paraphrase me to label me as a hypocrite. I did say some of those words. I’ve always maintained Scope, LTD, pay, retirement as my top priorities in that order. If the language for scope pans out I’d say we got 85% of my priorities so he thinks I’m a hypocrite because I’m ainti PBS. I still am anti PBS for the record but we aren’t getting a contract without it and the majority of the group is willing to go that route. Scope and LTD are more important than me being anti PBS. The reason I’ve alsways been anti pbs is because it is a staffing reduction. That hasn’t changed.
A win is a win even if it’s not a perfect game.
If the scope language doesn’t pan out then we have to go extra innings.