Originally Posted by FLYBOYMATTHEW

Would you rather have Alaska’s CBA without scope, or what we know about Spirit’s AIP with scope? One is a legacy whose contract was the result of binding arbitration, the other was pretty much in your same situation, and told by the mediator that the company was offering more than enough. Just because we don’t think it’s fair doesn’t mean the mediator sees it the same way. Unfortunately, I don’t see you getting Alaska pay and scope in this go around. It’s called pattern bargaining, and the pattern has been established.