Originally Posted by Truthanator

The rates are indeed less than half. I was making a simplistic statement.
You tried to turn it into a complex problem that has a whole slew of other factors. Now you don't want to address all the other factors that make your logic "logical".

So, not really the "end of the story there", is it.

If it is so much cheaper, as you are trying to claim, then why does it exist as it does?