Originally Posted by
GeeWizDriver
From multiple sources, a mandatory retirement age via FAA regulation for the 91K/135 world is on the back burner indefinitely.
Whether the company has the stones to try a unilateral policy change and fight the inevitable class action lawsuit is another question. The answer to which I believe is NO.
Unfortunately.
With age limit already law in 121, what would the 135 elderly have in defense? Imho 135 ops would suggest an age limit before 121 button pushers. What rationale could possibly be used to argue against it?