Originally Posted by
Tranquility
So, hypothetically, if there is an improvement in scope, but it doesn’t meet your personal muster, you’d automatically vote no without taking the other sections into consideration? Seems similar to those who automatically look at section 3, look at the rates, and automatically say no....
I’ve got news for you, there is no such thing as ‘iron clad’ scope. Southwest is close, though. Along those lines, if we have anything less than Southwest scope, you’d vote no?
I think everyone has their personal requirements for what would make them vote yes or compel them to vote no. Maybe his is the scope clause. To each his own.