Currently there are options for those who chose to credit 100+ hrs to do so within the CBA.
It's a choice some make, while others fly a more "traditional" schedule and enjoy the benefits of their choice.
This TA reduces CHOICE.
QOL will be severely diminished and flexibility drastically reduced or eliminated (REServe drops)
RES coverage requirements language refers to the "experience" of the company. If we trust that, green will turn red by DOT.

The opportunity to earn more, (while helping the nice folks at CS) with the addition of numerous options of 200% flying is a win win.

Why agree to:
ridiculously vague rescheduling language
the elimination of RES drops?
LTD at 5K
slower advancement (PBS)
No strong scope

BTW my "retro" is less than 5 months pay, which is 1/6th of full retro (30 months)
I did not enjoy that slap, and will not run back for more.