Originally Posted by
Boisemedic
It's not a retro payment. It's a ratification payment. There's a difference.
It's us rewarding them for dragging out negotiations for 3 years.
Anything less than 100% retro confirms that it is profitable to drag the process out as long as they see fit. Expect it again in 5 years, the precedent has been set. (Assuming we vote it in of course.)