That’s fine but please don’t try to make excuses for what is a fraction of what we are owed in compensation for the past 3 years of negotiations. It’s a bad look. Just let the money speak for itself and hope it’s enough to mask the bad (low hourly rates, no profit sharing, partial retro AKA insufficient “ratification payment”). For god’s sake don’t try and justify it. There are plenty of other gains to easily sell this TA on. No need to try to spin the fact that we are getting 1/6th retro by telling us it’s a “ratification payment.” Please... we know what it’s intended to be and it’s insulting. I’m a yes voter BTW...