Originally Posted by
CMFIC
Serious question:
What would the consensus among our yes voters be if there was no one-time taxed "bonus" for trading away so much... to be locked into a subpar agreement for the next 5-8 years?
I’m a yes voter but I would vote no if there was not a ratification/retro payment. However, I’m jot voting yes BECAUSE of it either. Not paying us anything for our pain and suffering for the past three years would make me so angry that I would vote no out of spite.