Originally Posted by
dotslash
I hear they did this also last time, scares people into yes vote with having no back up position. I think may be TA was loss when same negotiator was picked for this time. Hope we learn this time.
So you hear there were scare tactics in play last time around.
You weren't here, that's fine. But maybe now you're hearing only one side of the story. Accusations of "scare tactics"
were made back then, and low and behold they're being made again now!
Pretty sure it's the same cast of characters making the same worn out accusations now, and it's still BS.
A totally legitimate question is asked. "What happens next if the TA is not ratified?" An honest answer has to recognize that there is some uncertainty. Nobody can predict the future.
How long to resume negotiations?
What demands will Spirit bring to the table when they do reconvene?
Will there be a change of personnel in the negotiating committee?
...nobody knows