Originally Posted by
tweek
Two things you need to think about:
1. Do you think this company would ever want to start regional flying, or enter into a code share with flying we are capable of? If so explain why because I don't see it.
2. If this TA got voted down do you think the scope is what is going to be changed when we went back to the table? We already achieved some pretty big gains in scope as you said, and it doesn't seem to highest on most peoples gripe list.
All I'm saying is vote how you want, but realize that even if this TA fails, which I don't think it will, section 1 will probably remain. I would guess that the only changes we would receive would come to section 3 and in the end it would be at a financial loss.
1. Define regional flying? If you mean outsource to the lowest bidder in a CPA in any type of plane. It doesn’t have to be a cry from Dallas to Shreveport. It could be a CSeries from LA to ATL. Yes I think it will happen at some point. If allowed by scope
Traditional codeshare- yes I think it’s highly likely
2. I have no idea. I do know I would make it known to the NC what my priorities are.