View Single Post
Old 10-28-2007 | 11:09 AM
  #96  
HSLD's Avatar
HSLD
APC co-founder
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,853
Likes: 0
From: B777
Default

This program is on "hold" while Comair works through details with ALPA - this from a Comair HR rep I spoke with this week.

I wouldn't get wrapped around the axle on this until final language is available as it seems all affected parties are now at the table.


My own view (ie from a non-affected party) is that if CFIs are given a [pilot line] seniority number they should reasonably expect to be represented by ALPA when negotiating a contract. This would mean that CFIs should have work rules etc, if they are given a seniority number. Unions have a responsibility to represent and CFIs should be expected to pay dues and be covered under a unified agreement. The premise that the union "owns" pilot seniority numbers is accepted, so for a union to ignore a labor category or class of covered workers it could result in abrogation of the duty of fair representation lawsuits. There are a range of structural problems aside from a pilot "cutting" in line with respect to line seniority, though they can be solved.

The other option is to give the CFI a company seniority number (not a pilot seniority number) in which case it needs to be disclosed what value if any, the program offers a CFI.

The well is drying up for quality flight instructors and CFIs may be VERY difficult to come by in the future. If I were a union, I would jump on any opportunity to control what could evolve into true ab initio training.

Last edited by HSLD; 10-29-2007 at 10:06 AM.
Reply