Originally Posted by WutFace

I'm not an expert, but unlike you, I'm not asserting to be. By automatically assuming "pervasive" is incorrect, you're claiming some sort of wide-reaching knowledge.

Other than your simple first-person anecdotes, what are you claiming you know to back up your claims?

My theory: you're full of sh*t and you're reacting defensively to the claim that defies your limited worldview. Egos are a dangerous thing.
I'm sorry this lawsuit hurts you so personally, maybe therapy will help?

Edit: Another point. How many incidents of sexual assault or workplace harassment need to occur in the industry, in your opinion, for "pervasive" to be an accurate term? 5? 50? 500? It's purely subjective. And it's not your place to make that judgement call. What is acceptable to you is not acceptable to others. And the fact that you're willing to accept a certain level of sexual assault as "within norms" is f&cking revolting.