Originally Posted by
WutFace
Look. You all are waiting on this ironclad evidence to magically appear, but the fact of the matter is that there will never be any.
It will be her testimony vs his testimony. And that's it. So everyone screaming to wait for evidence is basically saying that her claim isn't good enough. And too many people are willing to dismiss and poke holes in her testimony, which mean this dude gets off free automatically.
I understand your desire for due process, but there's not much more to it. Her testimony and his testimony will be the limitations of this trial.
If it goes to trial (I would be surprised if it did) there would be much more that his and her testimony. What did the hotel staff see, what was on the surveillance footage, what did the FA who called the FODO see and say, what did the FODO say in the voice mail, what did she say to the ALPA rep that she called, etc. Much more than just their testimony that would be presented in a trial.