View Single Post
Old 03-24-2018 | 04:50 PM
  #194816  
Baradium
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
First of all, I have NOT made a fallacious argument. I have simply asked you a question you refuse to answer and then accuse me of attacking you. Please point out my fallacious argument. As far as ad hominem attacks, point one out to me and I'll do the same for you. You are the one that has been in attack mode the whole discussion. All I've been doing is defending myself (and others).

Your argument is that we (senior pilots) sold scope to benefit ourselves. I, and others, am trying to refute that argument with facts you refuse acknowledge, ie bankruptcy being a major factor. Unless you have been thru process personally, I don't think you can comprehend the scope of how screwed you (the pilot group) are.... You also need to realize that with every contract following the BK one, we have reduced small jet outsourcing. Currently RJ flying is dying a slow death. It's my feeling, in the next contract, we should be focusing on large jet scope that we have allowed to be eroded while tightening small jet scope.

My point is you refuse to acknowledge the position that bankruptcy puts a pilot group in. Hence my question. Yes, we voted it in..........with a proverbial gun to our head. The alternative being our Contract thrown out by the Court and the Company do it any way. If you cannot wrap your mind around that and acknowledge it, this discussion is over.

Dennt
Allowing additional 76 seaters while reducing the 50 seaters that Delta already was starting to get rid of does not count as a reduction in my mind. That one at least was a give to the company on scope. Numbers of airframes alone don't show the whole picture when the "win" was to give up more larger ones.

I'm not trying to argue the rest of your post, just that it hasn't been constant "take scope back!" since bankruptcy.