Originally Posted by
Ray Red
I wonder what the contents of her phone call to ALPA at 2:46 in the morning were? That detail was left out of the filing. And how, if you were roofied to an unconscious state, could you be in the mental state to remember exactly what they CA said about being F'd and the details of the voice mail from the FODO and make a phone call to ALPA?
What time was she awoken? how long did she stay in the CA's room after she woke up? Did she make the call to ALPA from the CA's room? I would think these details would be important to include in the court filing, yet they are absent. However her lawyers deemed in important to include things like: "There was not real food in the concierge's lounge, there were peanuts and vegetables. The flight attendants were eating peanuts and vegetables", "They were on barstools, and her feet were on the round edge"
I hope this thing goes to trial and the truth comes out.
Pleadings are plain language statements and are not required to provide great detail. That's what discovery is for during the litigation process. You won't see the discovery motions or any motions in limine. You might see the motion and response for summary judgement that AK is obligated to file. It will be denied if there is any question of fact, which there already is. After losing summary judgement, AK will deal. A trial is not likely, but it could happen.