Originally Posted by
Lugar
(1) So he had SOMEONE ELSE “give/administer any drug.”
(2) She participated while drugged.
(3) No need, she was drugged.
So that’s how you pass the lie detector test, while still being guilty. Those questions, and how they’re worded, are clearly intended for him to pass the test.
If she was drugged, she has to prove it. Unless she can. It’s a draw. No one is right or wrong.. you’d think. 39 year old woman would know how this works and call the police. For whatever reason she didn’t. She is no more believable than the Captain.