Your point? Innocent until proven guilty, right? Because of that ANY accusation should be scrutinized. Not to mention there is no evidence of his guilt other than her word against his. If I were in his shoes I would hope my brethren would support me as well. Not to mention the CA in question has a spotless record and no previous history or reputation to support her accusation. However, her story does cast reasonable doubt on his guilt. Not to mention she absolutely has a motive to cover her ass being on probation and being taken off a trip for a work rule violation.

It's apparent that you are in the group of "she said it so he must be guilty." That's the problem in this day in age. Men are automatically guilty until proven innocent in the pubic eye. That's not fair. If he did it then he absolutely should be punished. The issue is at this point in time there is no way to prove that he is guilty of anything. Yet he's still paying the price.

Don't forget, you are one accusation away from being in his shoes.