View Single Post
Old 11-07-2007 | 09:12 AM
  #33  
applefritter's Avatar
applefritter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by kronan
It will be interesting to see how it all shakes out. Personally, I don't think the Q+A is as binding as the signed LOA. But, I sure like the way the question is answered.

And, when you read the signed LOA on P.F.C, the one month invol language is embedded into the appropriate paragraph. Contrary to rumor, it is not merely a promise via FCIF.

https://pilot.fedex.com/general/post...signed_loa.pdf

ORIGINAL LOA LANGUAGE

If a pilot is inversely assigned, the following shall apply:
a. A pilot shall not be inversely assigned to a temporary vacancy at CDG or
HKG more than once in any period of six times the duration of the STV
(e.g., for a temporary vacancy of 3 bid periods, a pilot could not be
assigned more than once every 18 bid periods)
.
b. The pilot may not be inversely assigned for more than three bid periods at a time.


CURRENT LOA LANGUAGE

If a pilot is inversely assigned, the following shall apply:
a. A pilot shall not be inversely assigned to a temporary vacancy at CDG or
HKG more than once in any period of six times the duration of the STV.
b. The pilot may not be inversely assigned for more than one bid period at a time.
Reply