Originally Posted by
Bluedriver
Great, does an LCC corporation pay Coke less for their sugar water? Do they pay Michelin less for the rubber donuts? Do they short the fueler 20% for the dead dinosaurs?
They will no longer be shorting the Buck Rogers in the cockpit 20% either.
Originally Posted by
PasserOGas
Oh, I see. I am sure the shareholders of DAL and AA would be interrested to find out that they are actually "high cost carriers". In fact the term legacy is a misnomer. HCC makes much more sense.
Nonsense. Nothing low cost about us. It is part of a mind game.
Originally Posted by
queue
Is that a legal definition or a marketing buzzword? Is it an insurance standard (e.g. like Wyvern)?
e.g. car vs light truck (buzzwords: SUV, crossover)
The reason that I ask is because unless it's a legal classification, I would challenge their fictional nomenclature if it's used to negotiate pay or work rules.
BJ loves to make up words for stuff:
- Flight vs. inflight, pilots vs. FAs
- Mint vs 1st class
I don't want them ever saying they don't have first class and thus don't compare to Delta, AA, United.
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
Guys I support your pilot group fully in your struggle for market rate compensation. I made my insignificant point in response to a comment which posed the question “what is an LCC anyway?” in the context of ticket cost LCC vs legacy carrier. No big whoop. My comment contributed zero and this one is not much better, but just didn’t want to offend. Peace