Originally Posted by
BoilerUP
Yes, please draw a map how our contract was cost-neutral given the gains in compensation, vacation and retirement. I’m pretty dumb so a diagram is SUPER helpful.
Perhaps you can also sketch the “concessions” in the 2016 contract that give the company more pilot productivity compared to CBA 2006 - I’ll concede they got a lot of reserve flexibility in exchange for one less RSV duty day.
Agree. ..but let’s not do it here or on any other thread that’s meant for prospective newhires.
Those of you who voted no to the contract - I highly respect your perspectives but why don’t you start a new thread explaining all the pitfalls of the current contract? I mean that sincerely.
I voted yes BUT I also realize there were many things left out.. for example, I was hoping for a limit on P3 jumpseaters to/from Anchorage.
However, I voted for the contract and frankly having known then what I know now I’d still have voted yes.
If you start a new thread I’ll be glad to explain my perspective on why I voted yes (if you care) and maybe others will chime in too?
That way we’ll be able to focus on “
2018 UPS Hiring” on this thread?
There are many hopefuls out there who’re trying to get the best gouge on how to get hired. I feel like this squabbling makes things more difficult for them? They had nothing to do with the vote. It’d be awesome if we could help them all out.