Originally Posted by BeatNavy

Goes both ways.

Fact: our proposed 100-140 seat rates are SIGNIFICANTLY lower than peer average, and too low for major airline pilots. And its a quarter of our pilot group, likely larger if/when we make CS300 orders to replace some aging 320s
Fact: our proposed bus rate is at the low end of peer average, getting worse each year with below industry standard COLA increases. Especially for being a blended 321 rate.

Fact: PS is a joke, and only applies when the company is making profits, so should be an easy win for the company. If they are hurting financially, they don't pay us PS that year.

Those are the negatives. I acknowledge there are many good items in the AIP. But there are some negatives, some areas which just fall short, which HAVE to be looked at and acknowledged, even by the super excited, just happy to have an AIP almost automatic yes guys.