Originally Posted by
trip
The new coined term is "intentional non-compliance" EX. violate sterile <18K, = >intentional non-compliance.
Yes sterile violations are considered intentional and not protected.
I would also not bet on asap for any devation which occurred during or near a sterile violation, they might conclude that the sterile was a distraction which led to the other issue. Hopefully the crew in BUR was not shooting the breeze when the clipped UAL...