Originally Posted by
Screwed
And we all knew you would be the first to point it out !
If management felt the need to correct the record, then let them do it.
Don't be their beotch!
How many times a month does management lie? Yet I don't see you publicly correcting them.
Stop acting like such a beotch by spinning rumors!
and fyi, kindly point me to the company web forum and I'll gladly debunk their spin!
Originally Posted by
Stratocruzr
Actually was NOT TOTALLY debunked. Yes they did retract. I have a life and a job so I do not the live on these boards.
Flights WERE CANCLED DUE TO LACK OF STAFF. I don’t know how they covered them. THey could of been moved to one of our competitors, likely ATI (lowest bidder scab airline) That said it doesn’t change the facts they can’t staff 737s because of the absolute $#!t pay and ZERO work rules. 777s to follow for the same reason I’m sure here at some point soon.
And YES is was totally debunked. There is NO such decision to park 737's with 777's to follow with potential furloughs shortly thereafter. This rumor wasn't even in the ballpark! The union even put out an unofficial message saying to STOP spinning rumors because it weakens credibility, TO WHICH I AGREE! It may happen in the future but not now so why stir up a frenzy unnecessarily? oh, wait, that's right....polly wanna cracker?
Off topic question....do you know anything about ATI? It's an honest question because to make such a statement without any historical context raises many questions. Do we have a union responsibility to ATI pilots for example(probably not because they are ALPA). What if they are scabs? How do we know? What is a scab airline? Is that even possible? I though only pilots could be scabs....airlines might be bottom feeders and scope busters but scabs?