Originally Posted by
queue
Would BJ have violated a traditional scope clause when so many of its E190's were broken that they had to subcontract with a regional?
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
BJ didn't subcontract a regional. Embraer did and paid for it to be done.
BJ also pay protected it's pilots for that mess.
And if ALPA had been on property, BJ would have needed a side letter or MOU in order to break the scope for a period of time which I'm sure the union would have agreed to in that circumstance.