View Single Post
Old 06-11-2018 | 07:07 AM
  #195350  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Bucking Bar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Looks like for 320B’s there were 865 actual lines in Jun. They project 839 lines in July. The ALV was increased 6 hours or just over 7%. That would be a loss of 61 lines if system block hours were static or about 804 lines.It looks like block hours are up 3 or 4% not down for 320B’s from June to July. Sounds about What you would expect to see with new aircraft coming online. No black helicopters are hovering!
Edit: ALV increased was actually 5:45 not 6 but does not change the numbers much!
From a line perspective, looks like "all the above." Block times are definitely tighter. The 320 on-time numbers must be awful. That jet literally has more computers controlling the lavs than the 737 has total computers (don't believe me, defer the CIDS).

On the weekends - fughettabouit.

Layover times are down a couple of hours & ALV is up. The company is doing more with less and taking the hit in operational stats. Richard Anderson was an operations-minded man. Ed Bastian is a numbers man. These schedules feel like what schedules at the regionals felt like when we were Ed & Leo's lab rats.

As things stand now, when you are late a minute you might as well be late three hours. Nobody hustles once they've lost the "on time" until they figure you are about to time out. Then they find a little spring to their step rather than deal with 200 po'd people.

We've been into "extensions" 3 times in the last 30 days. Should be a rare occurrence; it is not.

Flight Operations management was beating the drum for a better system to emphasize and recover late flights when we are slightly behind schedule. Sincerely hoping their efforts yield results. Nobody likes being late.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 06-11-2018 at 07:20 AM.