Originally Posted by
Davetastic
Jack, you clearly have been critical of me for being critical of the union...but this post seems to give the impression that you agree that the union is in no hurry settle while the money is pouring in.....is that your position? If so, why have you been so critical of me for the exact same position if you acknowledge the very reason I have been so vocal about our predicament?
(This is an honest attempt to engage in dialogue and no offense or sarcasm intended or implied).
Dave... To give you an idea about why just about everyone is arguing with you and treating you like a troll, let me ask you this question. From your extensive knowledge of negotiations what offer is "the union" refusing to settle? Just what do you think "the union" could agree to today that the company would offer?
My personal opinion from talking to those in the room is that we could agree to an Amalgamation with Southern's work rules (28 hour work days, No business class international, no vacation, no rig.. etc) and average our work rules with Southern's. That'd mean an extra day or two of work away from home for you. It'd mean current book retirement. It'd mean a 5 year deal. It'd mean current book SCOPE... At best. It'd mean Kalitta rates. Less for a 767 Captain. Is that really what you want?
Furthermore... You pay them dues as you complain about. Leadership would be very receptive to your phone call and keep you directly updated if you cared to ask BK, CK or YP what the exact offer is that they're rejecting. Have you ever called them to ask? (Hint... I know the answer to the question...) PM me if you need phone numbers or you can get them off the 1224 website.
Now ask yourself this... Is BF gonna be taking your call to listen to your concerns?
Also... Stop with the conspiracy theories about "The money pouring in"... We're fighting for an "Industry Standard (or Leading) Contract". Every one of our EXCO would be making more money in that scenario and would work far less...
...Just trying to get you on our team.