Originally Posted by
PasserOGas
Oh, so you are arguing that code shares aren't profitable. I guess we don't need scope at all then.
If that is the case what is making you vote yes? The sub par work rules or industry trailing pay and profit sharing?
Codesharing allows for many things.
Scope is not there to prevent codesharing, its to prevent fee for departures.
Now this TA limits codesharing but actually prohibits fee for departure.
You know the difference right POG?
Now if you want to talk about profit sharing and pay, we can, just tell me that you know the difference between FFD and Codeshare and then you'll understand the need for Scope.
I know this is complicated, but we can take each section at a time.
Fair enough? Or do you just want to vent?