Originally Posted by
Bluedriver
Another misdirect. We are discussing the adequacy of the scope protections in this TA as it relates to codesharing. We are on point. You said, our concerns regarding domestic and international codeshare protections, specifically the lack of those protections, is invalid because BlueJet will want the "whole dollar" and not "pennies on the dollar".
So, my questions, just two posts ago:
If we need not worry about domestic codesharing because we would want the "whole dollar", then why are we codesharing with Hawaiian airlines out of our hub in Long Beach when we have an aircraft capable of serving the route and CAN serve the route? Do we not want the "whole dollar"?
Also, why did Delta maintain an extensive domestic codeshare with Alaska for YEARS right up unitl Alaska refused to drop it's other large domestic codeshare with American? When Alaska refused Delta's ultimatum, Delta decided to build it's own Seattle hub. Didn't Delta want the "whole dollar" all those years?
Ive responded to the first question already BD. Read it.
As for the Delta situation, you'd have to ask their management at the time- I wasnt in that office.
Now address, what specifically in the Scope section of the TA, that you feel leaves us vulnerable.
And btw, tell me, if you know why, limited codesharing is a positive thing. You are guilty of what you have accused me of- Dodging.
Jax-Hnl- why is this symbiotic?
I gotta go, but Ill wait for those answers Bd.
As always- hope you're well.