Originally Posted by
Bozo the pilot
Ive responded to the first question already BD. Read it.
As for the Delta situation, you'd have to ask their management at the time- I wasnt in that office.
Now address, what specifically in the Scope section of the TA, that you feel leaves us vulnerable.
And btw, tell me, if you know why, limited codesharing is a positive thing. You are guilty of what you have accused me of- Dodging.
Jax-Hnl- why is this symbiotic?
I gotta go, but Ill wait for those answers Bd.
As always- hope you're well.
Wait, you said the Airline would want the "whole dollar", so you need to explain to me why Delta didn't want the "whole dollar".
I've already explained the other Corp philosophy on the subject.
As for how codesharing CAN be positive, I guess this is all just a big misunderstanding on your part because I made that very clear yesterday:
" Bluedriver , Yesterday 12:47 PM
Quote:
Codesharing has at least two aspects. On the one hand codesharing customers into our network from a destination we *cannot* reach does improve load factor on our existing network and lead to new cities (DTW). Never disputed that. Didn't engage you on that point, intentionally. Doesn't mean I don't understand it Bozo.
The other side of the coin is codesharing to destinations we CAN reach (HNL & KEF *NOW* and soon to be Gatwick, Charles de Gaulle, Shannon, Dublin, Amsterdam, Brussels, Lisbon, Madrid etc...) but choose not to because of the investment and risk. We have instead elected to codeshare and take our "pennies on the dollar" up until now because it's low risk revenue.
Will that change, maybe. Been hearing Europe just a few years away since I got here.
Now I suggest you not insult my understanding of this industry again, as it's idiotic and should be beneath your debate skills."
End of quote.