Originally Posted by
BeatNavy
I brought it up in another thread but this one is more relevant so I’ll reiterate. I have yet to hear anyone answer these questions, and I am genuinely curious:
1) Do we currently have any domestic (or intl for that matter) codeshares on routes that we are capable of flying?
2) If (1) is “no,” why would we allow it to start under this TA?
3) Why does the company want this provision in this TA if we currently don’t do it, and haven’t done it in 18 years?
4) What is the company benefit in (3) worth? What did the pilot group gain by allowing them to do that?
5) Does this provision hurt, help, or not affect the pilot group...and why?
Toronto for sure is in range, though they could argue that Porter's destination is Toronto City Center which we can't do because of runway size, but Pearson is easily used.
And wouldn't Rekjavich (spelling??) be within range of a 320? Not sure on that one. We code share with Iceland Air.