Originally Posted by
hyperboy
I would argue that this is a market rate contract in plenty of ways. Yes I have read and watched all available information as well as contract comparisons across all sections to have this opinion. Is it perfect? No nor am I should have seen my last slamding.
I too, do not not act out of fear. The unknown without Merger and Scope language is REAL though.
IMHO. It is a solid foundation which we would need moving forward for all future contracts moving forward. Thoughts?
I agree it is market rate in many areas. Most of it is good. But some of the few items that are sticking points aren’t minor and sway too far from market rate in its totality, and may warrant a no vote. Which is why I’m not set one way or another yet. I also don’t know if I agree with the solid foundation part...it’s ok but could be more solid...now is the time to get what we need, not 4 years from now when the landscape may (or may not) change. We have leverage now. We need to leverage our leverage.