Originally Posted by
BunkerF16
If the range of our peers was from 5-10 and we come in at 5, technically we're peer average. Reality is, we're bottom of our peer set and we fall below them in 3-6 months and the gap grows each year.
I could have taken vacation with the current system if I wanted. But the reality is, if I used all my PTO now for vacation, and I use all my vacation and PTO with the new system for vacation only for comparison sake, I lose a week of vacation. Concession.
COLA--agree
PS--agree
OE--disagree that it only affects a small percentage of pilots. Now with me not able to bid them, I'll take higher productive trips that the guys below me were bidding because I passed them up for less productive trips the CKA were bidding. So it affects all FOs below me. Or, I upgrade. I'd sit about 30% CA in BOS on the Bus. So now I'd get trips and vacation that 70% of the CAs below me were normally getting, but now I'm taking. Same with vacation. Now as a reasonably senior CA, I'm going to get vacation that other CAs would normally have gotten had I not upgraded. Finally, even with my upgrade, I took a CA slot some junior guy would have loved to have had, but no can't because I'm taking his slot. So to say that the OE withholding of trips only affects a small amount of guys is shortsighted IMHO.
Again, are there things in the TA that are good? Of course. It's not total sh1tbag of a deal. But to me, if falls horribly short of where it should be, and what I believe we still could get if we turn this one down.
You should definitely vote no then.
But really you just said the TA puts us in the realm of average...
Do you believe, should we vote it down that you'll get your OE pairings back? Improved pay and PS and whatever else? Then will the time lost, how ever long that time is make up for the difference? Do you truly believe we have the leverage or the advantage? The NC didn't...
With all the RSA and VDA flying that goes on here? the extensions ect... do we have and advantage?
I know it's impossible to know.