Originally Posted by
BeatNavy
Agree, except for the bolded part. The vote was 7-5, no matter how you spin it. The 2 LGB Reps could have voted yes and still said they don’t like the implementation. I know what their email said. But they voted no. 7-5. As Pat just said in his email, it’s a binary vote. Yes or no. Not a “No, but...”
So you dont know that they voted no due to the implementation?
I actually agree with them. 18 months for some provisions is my least favorite part of the process.
That and not getting Delta +5% and 20% profit sharing.
