Originally Posted by
PastV1by10
So your saying the contract in it’s current form didn’t provide any consessions to reduce the number of reserve lines? The shiftable and reserve extensions didn’t provide any flexibility to the company to be able to reduce the 22% number? Come on man even the average line slug getting abused can see that.
You’re
Its
grammarly.com perhaps, if basic grammar is too tough?
I just quickly flipped through a couple of bid packages, doesn’t look like they are skimping on reserve lines. What evidence do you have to present to support your case?