View Single Post
Old 07-04-2018, 02:05 PM
  #18  
FTv3
Social Media retired.
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 777
Default

Originally Posted by PastV1by10 View Post
So your saying the contract in it’s current form didn’t provide any consessions to reduce the number of reserve lines? The shiftable and reserve extensions didn’t provide any flexibility to the company to be able to reduce the 22% number? Come on man even the average line slug getting abused can see that.
You’re

Its

grammarly.com perhaps, if basic grammar is too tough?

I just quickly flipped through a couple of bid packages, doesn’t look like they are skimping on reserve lines. What evidence do you have to present to support your case?

Last edited by FTv3; 07-04-2018 at 02:06 PM. Reason: Flow
FTv3 is offline