Originally Posted by
Salukipilot4590
Kinda hard when the contract allows the company to do what they are doing. It sucks man but they’re following the letter of the law like we did with LOA 65.
LOA 65 was an agreement that could be revoked at any time and was done so because the company was unwilling to provide information regarding their use of the agreement and ability to track the trips awarded in such fashion. Thus it was rescinded.
What they are doing is no different than if every pilot exploited a loophole in the contract, and there are several, and we simply said that we were "following the contract." Sure there is a letter of the law, but if we collectively did something of this nature you really think the company wouldn't slap a TRO on us? Not the same as LOA 65.
This is retaliation, plain and simple, and it must not be tolerated.