Originally Posted by
FLY100
I voted "No". There are issues that are not acceptable such as implementation schedule and we need better health insurance just to name a few. While I am eager for improvement, I know it is best to wait and make it count. We will be happier in the long run. In unity, there is strength.
A no vote doesn't affect implementation. It just doesn't. All you'll do is hand the company a giant pile of money and an expanded timeline with no deadlines to get the changes complete (if they start now).
So in your scenario, we get another TA in 18 months, and the company (which has been working all along on the implementation) agrees to a year implementation timeline. A win! Yay, we showed them! They shortened it by 6 months!
Meanwhile in reality the implementation actually got extended by 12 months for a total of 30 months from today.