Originally Posted by
Packrat
True, you're not the only game in town. But with the amount of freight that the listed carriers (you forgot Everts Air Cargo!) have to move on their own, losing Alaska freighter/belly freight creates and overwhelming backlog that the named carriers can't make up.
Perhaps you should limit your commentary to passenger ops because you obviously know zero about what the freight haulers in Alaska are doing.
And you can stick to SEA bub becasue you have no idea at the amount of freight we've given to NAC over the years when we only had 709 flying up here. And yet they seem to do just fine. They'll just bring one of their 767s up if they have to.
They'll all step up for the additional revenue as freight is gold up here.....