Originally Posted by
GuppyPuppy
The way I see it is that "NO" voters believe it's worth the risk to send this back. While "YES" voters don't think it's worth the risk. Nobody knows how long it would take to get a new TA. I've read 2 weeks to 2 years. And nobody knows what we may, or may not get in a new TA.
I can't say that I've come across anyone yet who is excited about this TA.
Nobody can argue that it falls short in many areas.
Good luck to all.
Gup
It should have never been sent to the pilots for a vote. Now that we are where we are, throwing away the gains that ARE in this contract would be stupid for an unknown outcome. I voted yes, not because I endorse this contract, but because I do think this company will try to keep it cost neutral one way or another with TA 2.