Originally Posted by
Fdxlag2
First define climate scientist, then show me their consensus and explain why a physicist, chemist, or hell a geologist can’t explain CO2, but Bill Nye the engineering guy can. Next define how many “climate scientists” claim humans cause climate change. Next tell me how much of the climate change is caused by humans and how much is attributed to volcanic or solar activity.
And the bottom line is your climate scientists still ignore water vapor as a greenhouse gas because they can’t explain its effect and it is the most prominent green house gas. BTW, thanks to fracking, the US has reduced its CO2 emmisions while the rest of the world hasn’t. But it still got hot this summer.
Would you trust the self-serving, partisan, agenda-grabbing nuts over at NASA?
https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
How about theses guys?
The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change | Science
https://www.skepticalscience.com/glo...termediate.htm
The evidence of consensus is quite clear if you remove the blinders of what you
want to believe and open your mind to the facts.
In any event, there's really no reason to continue with this back-and-forth is there? I'd wager the probability of us
not changing each other's mind at --- 97%