Originally Posted by Funk

I think the more accurate description for regionals from a mainline perspective has a number of elements. One is, “moving people cheaper than with mainline pilots and planes.” That’s why you see scope clauses in mainline contracts with pilots’ unions, and a constant push by mainline carriers to get “scope relief.” They need the regionals to scoop up people and deliver them to airports where they can be moved as a larger group on a larger aircraft. Part of that is that customers show a preference for more departures per day, even if it means a smaller aircraft. The trick for a mainline carrier is metering between mainline and regional aircraft to match capacity to traffic from some locations. So in that regard, mainline carriers want to keep regionals cheap, which is a function of both aircraft and labor costs. Teasing flow or interviews is, in my mind, purely a low cost carrot to help stabilize labor at a regional. As you have noted, even a flow has caveats that can allow a mainline carrier to shut off the spigot. Now, to your questions:

1) Unknown, but I don’t think it makes a difference. Biggest factor will be strength of resume so that it gets scored high enough to trigger an interview, and then you need to be fully prepared for the interview. Interview promises are nice, but if you show up with a thin resume and compete against other pilots that got an interview based on a more competitive resume and a lot of work to get it that way, how do you think you are going to compare during that day’s interviews? Much virtual ink has already been spilled on the topic of misleading guidance from companies to pilots before arranged interviews and regarding pilots that showed up poorly prepared. Don’t be that clown is all I can say.

2) If I knew the answer to that detailed and complicated question, I might put in my candidacy to run for the position of the Omnipotent and Almighty.

YMMV


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk