View Single Post
Old 08-30-2018 | 03:31 PM
  #18  
LoudFastRules's Avatar
LoudFastRules
Saab Saab Phooey!
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: Set Hundo
Default

Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
They never said industry leading pairings.

They said industry leading paring language. Which it is.

The reality is the company was taking over the pairing build with or without the CBA. We secured protections in the cba we wouldn’t have otherwise.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hmmm. We had this neat thing negotiated, called a CBA. You'd think they would have maybe addressed this issue with some industry standard (some have, some don't) language, like pilots will CONTINUE to build the pairings - just like they have been.

Ya know, when all this "Industry leading pairing language" malarky was being thrown irresponsibly around, I pretty much assumed it meant that we were re-assuming the responsibility of building the pairings ourselves.

Without that ability, the language is meaningless and worthless. Putting extreme outer boundaries on the ********y things ********y people can do to us by treating us like ****** is not exactly something to celebrate as "industry-leading".

AND YES: I did emphasize that pilots building pairings was one of my top priorities in all surveys and communications with reps.

As a life-long union member, I am sorry to say that ALPA totally screwed the pooch on this issue.
Reply