Originally Posted by
BigZ
It's not.
In any other case
A. The burden of proof that someone else was chosen over you is squarely on you. Good luck with that.
B. At various times and various places different quals are preferred. Someone with a recent history of successful training might be more hireable than 15+ years in the same aircraft type of a pilot. Such is life.
You are saying it's not.
Why not? You guys keep bringing emotions in to it. It's not about that.
A. Burden of proof requirement is not an argument pro or against. It's merely a statement that one would need to prove the claim. Sure, absolutely. But at any rate, let's say it has been proven beyond reasonable doubt. For the sake of the argument.
B. Fair point except I deliberately excluded from my hypothetical example any other factors as they are unknown and therefore subjective. But to make it clearer, let's say the sum of all unknown factors/points in each individual's application is equal.
So same question. Let's even go further in order to isolate ourselves from any prejudice of our knowledge of how the airline recruitment process works. Let's consider two applicants in some OTHER industry. Same known facts: one younger but less experienced, the other older but more experienced. Both have been pursuing this opportunity for equal amount of time, updating applications with equal frequency. All unknown factors cancel each other out. The younger applicant got an interview, the older applicant did not. (Hired or not is irrelevant). Ageism or not?