View Single Post
Old 10-05-2018 | 11:22 AM
  #30  
chrisreedrules's Avatar
chrisreedrules
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by moon
The poster was referring to how easily members of your pilot group are swayed to benefit themselves even if it screws over other people. Those members will be flowing to AA and would vote for scope relief to benefit themselves even if it would screw over the entire industry. Your group has a history of being interested in only themselves so he or she has a point.
The yes voters are already at AA. And to my knowledge none of them are actively negotiating anything on behalf of AA pilots. And now that they’re at AA, why would they magically start voting in concessions? As I stated above, I guess I’m just not seeing the logic in your statements.

You’re making blanket statements about our pilot group based on pilots that aren’t even here anymore. And the ones that are here are the same ones who would have just as happily gone to Envoy or Piedmont if the bases worked out in their favor. This industry is so completely different than it was 5+ years ago.

Regardless I don’t care if you have disdain towards PSA or its pilots and I certainly don’t blame you or any other Envoy pilot. PSA’s vote hurt Envoy pilots. But those who voted for that contract are mostly all gone to mainline or going to retire shortly. Keep espousing vitriol towards current PSA pilots all you want. Ultimately it’s counterproductive.
Reply