View Single Post
Old 10-25-2018 | 05:33 AM
  #9  
StartngOvr's Avatar
StartngOvr
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 792
Likes: 26
From: Drivin’ the bus
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
Any attempt to spin this as bad for a Pilot is ridiculous.

Scoop


Scoop,

Usually I agree with you, but I'll go ahead and take the bait.....

This is bad for pilots. There. Ok, I said it.

Here's my concern. By releasing pilots sooner, this is is an advantage to the company as they can now release you to rest and then assign another short call RAP that much sooner. Big picture, this means more short call coverage with fewer pilots. Translation: "job killer". They have identified an inefficiency which requires more pilots, and are looking to trim the fat.

Obviously the end game for the company is NOT to have the same total number of reserve pilots with shorter Short Calls. It's a way to reduce required headcount and keep essentially the same short call coverage to protect the operation.

I sit Reserve in my category a lot. I live in base and actually put in yellow slips sometimes to be first on short call. I still have never had a month of 7 short calls. Even when I ask for it. With this change, I'm predicting an increase in the number of short call periods per month for those exposed to it.

As far as the guy who can now commute home? I don't think it was a big deal as you could have called and got released early most times. (Intl might be different?) Additionally, now you won't be able to go home anyway because guess what, since you're done earlier, you're back on short call tomorrow morning!

Scoop, as someone who argues against the 30-day bid periods as a job killer, I'm surprised you aren't thinking the same way on this change?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Reply