Old 10-25-2018 | 08:05 PM
  #124  
TonyC's Avatar
TonyC
Organizational Learning 
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,948
Likes: 0
From: Directly behind the combiner
Default

Originally Posted by kronan

Truth is TonyC reversed the actual limits
401(a)17 limit is 275k. Beyond which Mgt makes No additional Contributions, regardless of whether the B plan rate is 8%, 9%, or 20%

the 415(c)(1)(a) limit is 55k. Beyond which no DC contributions are possible (other than Catch-up for those of us at least 50 in any given year).

No, he didn't. He said:
Originally Posted by TonyC

We already have pilots hitting the 415(c)(1)(a) contribution limits.

I should have used an uppercase A between the last pair of parentheses, but other than that ...


BLOB responded by talking about the "the IRS income cap", but that's not what I referenced. (Do you think I have "(c)(1)(A)" memorized? I looked it up (IRS News Release IR-2017-177, Oct. 19, 2017 "IRS Announces 2018 Pension Plan Limitations; 401(k) Contribution Limit Increases to $18,500 for 2018") before I quoted. )



For the record, I'm not opposed to raising the "B" Fund percentage, and I'm a proponent of Cash over the Cap. However, I do not believe it can replace the value of a 50% Income Replacement valued "A" Fund. Furthermore, I'm not willing to settle for only an improvement in the "B" Fund as a way to halt the Variable Benefit scheme train.
  • Abandon the Variable Benefit nonsense.
  • Raise the FAE Cap on the "A" Plan.
  • Raise the contribution percentage of the "B" Plan, and include Cash Over Cap.
  • Implement a Cost of Living Adjustment for the "A" Plan.

That should be our path forward.







.
Reply