I was really trying to believe her but now after reading both complaints I have to say that I believe him.
His story is comparatively very logical. We drank, I got drunk, I barely remember anything. I shouldn’t have been drinking so close o the window, I entered HIMS did my thing, etc.
Her story is essentially that I was drugged because I hold my liquor better than that. I know I was raped because my panties were in my purse. Say what?
This is a civil suite so the burden of proof is only a “perponderance of the evidence” so I think he has a really good shot at winning. What I would do is settle with everybody else in monetary terms. Then go all the way to trial against her.